[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13223271#comment-13223271
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3853:
-------------------------------------
Hi Benson, thanks for the patch.
I think it would be better though if our example didnt recommend MultiFields
(or at least noted that this is the slow/trappy way to access terms)
Also we need some null checks I think in the example, because e.g. fields() is
allowed to return null, so it should be checked before it has an
iterator...
but i think this is overall a great idea? perhaps if we come up with a good
example we can think of a place in the javadocs it could reside as well,
so its not just in the migration guide (e.g. if you are a new Lucene user, you
likely wouldnt even look at MIGRATE.txt but this would still be useful).
> Improve CHANGES.txt for FieldsEnum/TermsEnum
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3853
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3853
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core/other
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Benson Margulies
> Attachments: LUCENE-3853.patch
>
>
> The text in CHANGES.txt that explains the new situation with FieldsEnum
> doesn't explain how to get one, and the explanation of TermEnum seems not to
> have kept up with the code. here's a patch to CHANGES.txt.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
