Does using Jetty8 change the wisdom that the org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector is better then org.eclipse.jetty.server.nio.SelectChannelConnector? I know that in one setup we had lots of clients losing their connections to Solr with the bio.SocketConnector, and then when we switched to the nio.SelectChannelConnector those dropped connections almost completely disappeared.
I attribute the change to having lots of clients holding connections open for many seconds, and the no.SelectChannelConnector dealing with that better. I tried to find some info on "Why Jetty8?" but didn't find much out there that wasn't from 2009! Eric On Mar 6, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: > How do people feel about moving to Jetty 8 on trunk? > > I think we should do this soon, so it gets as much testing as possible. > > It is good have an official release be our best tested container. > > Here is a working branch: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/solr_3159_jetty8/ > > ryan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > ----------------------------------------------------- Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com Co-Author: Apache Solr 3 Enterprise Search Server available from http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
