[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13224831#comment-13224831 ]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on SOLR-3159 at 3/7/12 11:33 PM: -------------------------------------------------------------- That should not matter as the servlet-api.jar is just a interface hull, version is irrelevant. To compile solr, an older servlet API would be even better as requirement, so the WAR is enforced to also run in older tomcats :-) So I would revert the jar file in the lib/ folder for *compiling* of solr to 2.4 and only use the 3.0 one for *executing* jetty8 in the example or when running tests. was (Author: thetaphi): That should not matter as the servlet-api.jar is just a interface hull, version is irrelevant. To compile solr, an older servlet API would be even better as requirement, so the WAR is enforced to also run in older tomcats :-) So I would revert the jar file in the lib/ folder of solr to 2.4 and only use the 3.0 one for executing jetty8. > Upgrade to Jetty 8 > ------------------ > > Key: SOLR-3159 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3159 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Ryan McKinley > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.0 > > > Solr is currently tested (and bundled) with a patched jetty-6 version. > Ideally we can release and test with a standard version. > Jetty-6 (at codehaus) is just maintenance now. New development and > improvements are now hosted at eclipse. Assuming performance is equivalent, > I think we should switch to Jetty 8. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org