OK, that settles that <G>, 1.6 going forward.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Sorry, I misunderstood the original question... > > -1 to *only* support Java 7 in both Lucene and Solr. This is way to early. > > Java 7 is not yet released to the public end user, you can only get it as > "developer" resource, not on official end-user java download triggered e.g. > from the browser on missing plugin. > > Uwe > > -- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > > > > Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> schrieb: >> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Which just begs the question (sorry if it has been discussed before) of >> > whether we should officially only support Solr/Lucene 4.0 under Java >> > 1.7. >> >> Lucene's purpose is to be a dependency for other projects, and that >> would force all those projects to require Java7 also. Seems like that >> should wait. >> >> Solr is a different matter, and has historically moved to new Java >> versions earlier. But it feels a bit early there too... unless the >> features in Java7 outweigh the potential pain to people when we >> require it. >> From a practical development point of view, it would be nice to have >> 4.x and 5.0 on the same Java version to minimize backporting pain. >> >> -Yonik >> lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr >> Open >> Source Search Conference. >> Boston May 7-10 >> >> ________________________________ >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
