[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13232774#comment-13232774
 ] 

Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3885:
-------------------------------------

bq. as a simple workaround can the smokeTester.py (which sits in 
dev-tools/scripts) just look for ../maven (from its own location as a 
reference)?

Yes, I think that should work, but this should be done only if the release 
branch isn't available, since when there is a release branch, the likelihood of 
a mismatch between the local checkout and the release branch is higher.
                
> smokeTestRelease.checkMaven should not require a release branch
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3885
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3885
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: general/build
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>
> Currently this throws an exception, but I think it should unpack any pom 
> templates it needs from the artifacts themselves.
> # its nice to be able to generate and test RC's without having an official 
> branch yet. I am currently doing this just to
>   move us closer to release (just trying to find bugs etc). Also anyone 
> should be able to just toss up an RC at any time.
> # its better to test the artifacts themselves rather than anything in SVN. At 
> the least the -src jars have an svn export
>   so this should work... if it doesn't, then there is a packaging bug.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to