[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-3888:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-3888.patch

The patch cannot be compiled now because I changed the return type of the 
method in Dictionary interface but all implemented classes have not been 
changed.

Please give some comment because I'm new to spell checker. If no problem to go, 
I'll continue to work.
                
> split off the spell check word and surface form in spell check dictionary
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3888
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3888
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/spellchecker
>            Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.6, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3888.patch
>
>
> The "did you mean?" feature by using Lucene's spell checker cannot work well 
> for Japanese environment unfortunately and is the longstanding problem, 
> because the logic needs comparatively long text to check spells, but for some 
> languages (e.g. Japanese), most words are too short to use the spell checker.
> I think, for at least Japanese, the things can be improved if we split off 
> the spell check word and surface form in the spell check dictionary. Then we 
> can use ReadingAttribute for spell checking but CharTermAttribute for 
> suggesting, for example.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to