I think maybe this test needs to be toned down after simpletext
docvalues... i've noticed with nightly builds (-Dtests.nightly,
-Dtests.multiplier=5) it oom's often.

i dont think we want to disable simpletext for this test, because its
the only other real docvalues we have.

instead we probably just want to tone it down... i'll see if i can
reproduce locally.

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1869/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.index.TestMixedCodecs.test
>
> Error Message:
> GC overhead limit exceeded
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
>        at java.nio.ByteBuffer.wrap(ByteBuffer.java:367)
>        at java.lang.StringCoding$StringDecoder.decode(StringCoding.java:155)
>        at java.lang.StringCoding.decode(StringCoding.java:196)
>        at java.lang.String.<init>(String.java:491)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.codecs.simpletext.SimpleTextPerDocProducer.readString(SimpleTextPerDocProducer.java:210)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.codecs.simpletext.SimpleTextPerDocProducer$ValueReader.fromString(SimpleTextPerDocProducer.java:309)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.codecs.simpletext.SimpleTextPerDocProducer$SimpleTextDocValues.read(SimpleTextPerDocProducer.java:185)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.codecs.simpletext.SimpleTextPerDocProducer$SimpleTextDocValues.load(SimpleTextPerDocProducer.java:150)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.DocValues$SourceCache$DirectSourceCache.load(DocValues.java:680)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.DocValues.getSource(DocValues.java:81)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.codecs.simpletext.SimpleTextPerDocProducer$SimpleTextDocValues.getDirectSource(SimpleTextPerDocProducer.java:194)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.codecs.DocValuesConsumer.merge(DocValuesConsumer.java:112)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.codecs.DocValuesConsumer.merge(DocValuesConsumer.java:90)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.codecs.PerDocConsumer.merge(PerDocConsumer.java:60)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentMerger.mergePerDoc(SegmentMerger.java:379)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentMerger.merge(SegmentMerger.java:116)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.mergeMiddle(IndexWriter.java:3382)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.merge(IndexWriter.java:3004)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.SerialMergeScheduler.merge(SerialMergeScheduler.java:37)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.maybeMerge(IndexWriter.java:1644)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.forceMerge(IndexWriter.java:1458)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.forceMerge(IndexWriter.java:1412)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.RandomIndexWriter.doRandomForceMerge(RandomIndexWriter.java:361)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.RandomIndexWriter.close(RandomIndexWriter.java:406)
>        at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestMixedCodecs.test(TestMixedCodecs.java:57)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>        at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
>        at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
>        at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>        at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
>
>
>
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 13394 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



-- 
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to