[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13237604#comment-13237604
]
The Alchemist commented on LUCENE-1410:
---------------------------------------
Out of curiousity, is the PFOR effort dead? I was thinking about running some
newer benchmarks using Java 7, and see if that makes a difference.
Do you guys think that's worthwhile?
> PFOR implementation
> -------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1410
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: core/index
> Reporter: Paul Elschot
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Bulk Postings branch
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1410-codecs.tar.bz2, LUCENE-1410.patch,
> LUCENE-1410.patch, LUCENE-1410.patch, LUCENE-1410.patch, LUCENE-1410b.patch,
> LUCENE-1410c.patch, LUCENE-1410d.patch, LUCENE-1410e.patch,
> TermQueryTests.tgz, TestPFor2.java, TestPFor2.java, TestPFor2.java,
> autogen.tgz, for-summary.txt
>
> Original Estimate: 21,840h
> Remaining Estimate: 21,840h
>
> Implementation of Patched Frame of Reference.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
