This seems like it's a JIRA, I couldn't find anything like this that's
already a JIRA on a quick look.
>From a client:
Here's a fragment of a schema file:
<fields>
<field name="id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true"
required="true" />
<field name="title_text" type="text_general" indexed="true"
stored="true" multiValued="false" />
<field name="title_phonetic" type="phonetic" indexed="true"
stored="true" multiValued="false" />
<dynamicField name="*_text" type="text_general" indexed="true"
stored="false" />
<dynamicField name="*_phonetic" type="phonetic" indexed="true"
stored="false" />
</fields>
<copyField source="*_text" dest="*_phonetic" />
Here's an input doc:
<add>
<doc>
<field name="id">ID1</field>
<field name="title_text">1st Document</field>
<field name="description_text">Another field</field>
</doc>
</add>
OK, add the doc with the above schema, and to a q=*:*&fl=*
The response does NOT contain title_phonetic.
It looks like IndexSchema.registerCopyField won't notice that
title_phonetic is a non-dynamic field and make a title_text ->
title_phonetic mapping.
Is this a JIRA or intended or "just not worth fixing"?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
