[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13238819#comment-13238819
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2599:
-------------------------------------

I think thats confusing. It should say Lucene 3.6, Lucene 4. Your current 
wording
makes people think that they have to use Solr to do spatial queries, and thats 
not
true, correct?
                
> Deprecate Spatial Contrib
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2599
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2599
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/spatial
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Chris Male
>            Assignee: Chris Male
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2599.patch, LUCENE-2599.patch
>
>
> The spatial contrib is blighted by bugs.  The latest series, found by Grant 
> and discussed 
> [here|http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/c32e81783642df47/spatial_rethinking_cartesian_tiers_implementation]
>  shows that we need to re-think the cartesian tier implementation.
> Given the need to create a spatial module containing code taken from both 
> lucene and Solr, it makes sense to deprecate the spatial contrib, and start 
> from scratch in the new module.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to