[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13249237#comment-13249237
 ] 

Iulius Curt commented on LUCENE-3109:
-------------------------------------

Good question. It seems I didn't add the renamed sources.

Could you please upload the patch with the shifted-code-conflicts you mentioned 
about solved?
This would be wonderful, I could much easily redo only the renamed sources.

Thanks for your feedback.
                
> Rename FieldsConsumer to InvertedFieldsConsumer
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3109
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3109
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: core/codecs
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Simon Willnauer
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3109.patch, LUCENE-3109.patch
>
>
> The name FieldsConsumer is missleading here it really is an 
> InvertedFieldsConsumer and since we are extending codecs to consume 
> non-inverted Fields we should be clear here. Same applies to Fields.java as 
> well as FieldsProducer.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to