[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13255705#comment-13255705
 ] 

Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-3284:
------------------------------------

After looking at existing tests to see how I might implement tests for this new 
functionality, I couldn't see how to do it.  Also, I noticed that there are 
tests for SolrCloud and something else called ChaosMonkey.  All tests in solr/ 
pass with this patch, but I don't know how SolrCloud might be affected.  I 
would hope that it already handles exceptions properly and therefore wouldn't 
have any problems, but I have never looked at the code or used SolrCloud.

                
> StreamingUpdateSolrServer swallows exceptions
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3284
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3284
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: clients - java
>    Affects Versions: 3.5, 4.0
>            Reporter: Shawn Heisey
>         Attachments: SOLR-3284.patch
>
>
> StreamingUpdateSolrServer eats exceptions thrown by lower level code, such as 
> HttpClient, when doing adds.  It may happen with other methods, though I know 
> that query and deleteByQuery will throw exceptions.  I believe that this is a 
> result of the queue/Runner design.  That's what makes SUSS perform better, 
> but it means you sacrifice the ability to programmatically determine that 
> there was a problem with your update.  All errors are logged via slf4j, but 
> that's not terribly helpful except with determining what went wrong after the 
> fact.
> When using CommonsHttpSolrServer, I've been able to rely on getting an 
> exception thrown by pretty much any error, letting me use try/catch to detect 
> problems.
> There's probably enough dependent code out there that it would not be a good 
> idea to change the design of SUSS, unless there were alternate constructors 
> or additional methods available to configure new/old behavior.  Fixing this 
> is probably not trivial, so it's probably a better idea to come up with a new 
> server object based on CHSS.  This is outside my current skillset.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to