[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260879#comment-13260879
]
Benson Margulies edited comment on SOLR-3405 at 4/24/12 7:44 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Wait, who said "putting your war application in maven means we must expose it
as if it were an API and take responsibility"? It's not true. It might be a
default behavior of the maven-war-plugin in simple cases, but that's different.
Anyway, to answer the previous question, no, of course I can't do that with the
binary package.
The issue here should *not* be the war file. If there's an issue, it's the
dependency tree of solr-core as an ordinary dependency, and whether we want it
to list (a) ordinary released versions of third party stuff, (b) patched
versions of third party stuff, or (c) no versions of third party stuff. If you
want (c), then <optional>true</optional> makes sense to me, as it allows
Steve's maven build to work and leaves the dependency management for these
things to the end user. Inconvenient but safe.
was (Author: bmargulies):
Wait, who said "putting your war application in maven means we must expose
it as if it were an API and take responsibility"? It's not true. It might be a
default behavior of the maven-war-plugin in simple cases, but that's different.
Anyway, to answer the previous question, no, of course I can't do that with the
binary package.
> maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3405
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Lets take the commons-csv scenario:
> * apache-solr-3.5.0 binary distribution contains no actual commons-csv.jar
> anywhere,
> in fact it contains no third party jars (the stuff present in solr/lib) at
> all.
> * binary distribution contains only the jars necessary for *solrj* and
> *contrib plugins*, and a solr.war
> I think the maven artifacts should match whats in the binary release (no
> third party jars
> inside the .war are "exposed", we just publish the .war itself). This exposes
> a lot less surface area.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
