[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luca Cavanna updated LUCENE-4019:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-4019.patch

Small patch: affix rules with less than 5 elements are now ignored. I added a 
specific test with a new affix file containing an example of rule shorter than 
it should be. Let me know if you prefer to add a warning when a rule is 
skipped. Hunspell does that only with a specific command line option.
                
> Parsing Hunspell affix rules without regexp condition
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4019
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4019
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/analysis
>    Affects Versions: 3.6
>            Reporter: Luca Cavanna
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4019.patch
>
>
> We found out that some recent Dutch hunspell dictionaries contain suffix or 
> prefix rules like the following:
> {code} 
> SFX Na N 1
> SFX Na 0 ste
> {code}
> The rule on the second line doesn't contain the 5th parameter, which should 
> be the condition (a regexp usually). You can usually see a '.' as condition, 
> meaning always (for every character). As explained in LUCENE-3976 the 
> readAffix method throws error. I wonder if we should treat the missing value 
> as a kind of default value, like '.'.  On the other hand I haven't found any 
> information about this within the spec. Any thoughts?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to