Ok, it should work with intellij now (didn't check though). These nested classes will still be run by intellij runner (unless you know of a way to restrict it to Test* classes) but will be ignored.
Dawid On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: >> After updating, I ran through all of the module test run configurations on >> IntelliJ, and one test failed: > > Eh. This one is again a test that normally shouldn't be included in > the suite (nested class). It is meant to fail because it's actually > testing that assertion in LuceneTestCase... I'll see what I can do. > > Dawid > >> >> -------- >> java.lang.RuntimeException: There are overridden methods annotated with >> org.junit.Before. These methods would not be executed by JUnit and need to >> manually chain themselves which can lead to maintenance problems. Consider >> using different method names or make hook methods private. >> Method: public void >> org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides$Before1.before()#before[] >> possibly overriden by public void >> org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides$Before3.before()#before[] >> at >> org.apache.lucene.util.ValidateNoInstanceHooksOverrides.checkNoShadows(ValidateNoInstanceHooksOverrides.java:68) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.util.ValidateNoInstanceHooksOverrides.validate(ValidateNoInstanceHooksOverrides.java:45) >> at >> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runCustomValidators(RandomizedRunner.java:1357) >> at >> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:595) >> at >> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:132) >> at >> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:551) >> -------- >> >> Steve >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dawid Weiss [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:57 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Clean-jars. >> >> I've updated a jar dependency version -- you need to: >> >> ant clean-jars resolve >> >> Does anybody have anything against it if I make 'ant eclipse' depend on >> 'clean-jars resolve' sequence? I am also tempted to make ant clean perform a >> cleanup of jar files since anything else (ant test, etc.) does a resolve >> anyway... >> >> Dawid >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional >> commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
