[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13287408#comment-13287408
 ] 

Tanguy Moal commented on LUCENE-4063:
-------------------------------------

I agree with both of you, it sounds like a design change.

I think Jacques Savoy's algorithm was intended to be used on words. Not on 
numbers, or mixes of both (like in 22h00).

Which is true for any stemmer, I think. That's why on the mailing I also 
suggested we could have each stemmer share a common interface that would filter 
non-stemmable literals out of the way. That could prevent the same issue to 
raise from a different stemming implementation.

I'm just saying this as I think about it.
                
> FrenchLightStemmer performs abusive compression of (arbitrary) repeated 
> characters in long tokens
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4063
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4063
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/analysis
>    Affects Versions: 3.4, 4.0
>            Reporter: Tanguy Moal
>            Assignee: Steven Rowe
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4063.patch, SOLR-3463.patch, SOLR-3463.patch, 
> SOLR-3463.patch
>
>
> FrenchLightStemmer performs aggressive deletions on repeated character 
> sequences, even on numbers.
> This might be unexpected during full text search.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to