[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13287584#comment-13287584
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4098:
--------------------------------------------
Aha, phew! A bug in the test ... with that change the test looks like it's
passing so far ... I'll beast it for a while. Thanks Adrien.
> Efficient bulk operations for packed integer arrays
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4098
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4098
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/other
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4098.patch, LUCENE-4098.patch
>
>
> There are some places in Lucene code that {iterate over,set} ranges of values
> of a packed integer array. Because bit-packing implementations (Packed*) tend
> be slower than direct implementations, this can take a lot of time.
> For example, under some scenarii, GrowableWriter can take most of its
> (averaged) {{set}} time in resizing operations.
> However, some bit-packing schemes, such as the one that is used by
> {{Packed64SingleBlock*}}, allow to implement efficient bulk operations such
> as get/set/fill. Implementing these bulk operations in
> {{PackedInts.{Reader,Mutable}}} and using them across other components
> instead of their single-value counterpart could help improve performance.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
