[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292519#comment-13292519 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4101: -------------------------------------------- Well ... both types are indexed; the only difference is one is stored and one isn't. I think negation is OK since it's right there next to the positive form too. We could, alternatively, not make these TYPE_XXX's public (then their names matter much less!) ... but I think it's useful having them public so an app can start from a known type and then change it. > Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED > --------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-4101 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Michael McCandless > Assignee: Michael McCandless > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 4.0, 5.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-4101.patch, LUCENE-4101.patch, LUCENE-4101.patch, > LUCENE-4101.patch, LUCENE-4101.patch > > > Spinoff from LUCENE-3312. > For 4.0 I think we should simplify the sugar field APIs by requiring > that you add a StoredField if you want to store the field. Expert users > can still make a custom FieldType that both stores and indexes... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org