[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13398446#comment-13398446
]
Nikola Tankovic commented on LUCENE-3312:
-----------------------------------------
I think this is now OK, I'll put in util.*
{code}
public Iterator<StorableField> storedFieldsIterator() {
return new FilterIterator<StorableField, Field>(fields.iterator()) {
@Override
protected boolean predicateFunction(Field field) {
return field.type.stored();
}
};
}
public Iterator<IndexableField> indexedFieldsIterator() {
return new FilterIterator<IndexableField, Field>(fields.iterator()) {
@Override
protected boolean predicateFunction(Field field) {
return field.type.indexed();
}
};
}
private abstract class FilterIterator<T, U extends T> implements Iterator<T> {
private Iterator<U> iterator;
private T next = null;
private boolean nextIsSet = false;
protected abstract boolean predicateFunction(U field);
public FilterIterator(Iterator<U> baseIterator) {
this.iterator = baseIterator;
}
public boolean hasNext() {
if (nextIsSet) {
return true;
} else {
return setNext();
}
}
public T next() {
if (!nextIsSet) {
if (!setNext()) {
throw new NoSuchElementException();
}
}
nextIsSet = false;
return next;
}
public void remove() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
private boolean setNext() {
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
U object = iterator.next();
if (predicateFunction(object)) {
next = object;
nextIsSet = true;
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
{code}
> Break out StorableField from IndexableField
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3312
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3312
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/index
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Nikola Tankovic
> Labels: gsoc2012, lucene-gsoc-12
> Fix For: Field Type branch
>
> Attachments: lucene-3312-patch-01.patch, lucene-3312-patch-02.patch,
> lucene-3312-patch-03.patch, lucene-3312-patch-04.patch,
> lucene-3312-patch-05.patch
>
>
> In the field type branch we have strongly decoupled
> Document/Field/FieldType impl from the indexer, by having only a
> narrow API (IndexableField) passed to IndexWriter. This frees apps up
> use their own "documents" instead of the "user-space" impls we provide
> in oal.document.
> Similarly, with LUCENE-3309, we've done the same thing on the
> doc/field retrieval side (from IndexReader), with the
> StoredFieldsVisitor.
> But, maybe we should break out StorableField from IndexableField,
> such that when you index a doc you provide two Iterables -- one for the
> IndexableFields and one for the StorableFields. Either can be null.
> One downside is possible perf hit for fields that are both indexed &
> stored (ie, we visit them twice, lookup their name in a hash twice,
> etc.). But the upside is a cleaner separation of concerns in API....
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
