[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13402680#comment-13402680
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4172:
-------------------------------------

that sounds nice: I think we always want to fix 'duplicate throws'.

But redundant throws requires some decisions... basically i looked at each one 
and:
* nuke the redundant throws if its a static method, private, or 
package-private, or final
* nuke the redundant throws if its a ctor (subclass can always declare its own)
* keep the redundant throws if its public/protected non-final method that can 
be overridden
                
> clean up redundant throws clauses
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4172
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4172
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4172.patch
>
>
> examples are things like ctors that list throws XYZException but actually 
> dont, and things like 'throws CorruptIndex, LockObtainedFailed, IOException' 
> when all of these are actually IOException.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to