[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Miller updated SOLR-3215:
------------------------------

    Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

we need to reevaluate this in regards to the update processor work that hossman 
did - this may not be needed unless something else prompts it
                
> We should clone the SolrInputDocument before adding locally and then send 
> that clone to replicas.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3215
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3215
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Mark Miller
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-3215.patch
>
>
> If we don't do this, the behavior is a little unexpected. You cannot avoid 
> having other processors always hit documents twice unless we support using 
> multiple update chains. We have another issue open that should make this 
> better, but I'd like to do this sooner than that. We are going to have to end 
> up cloning anyway when we want to offer the ability to not wait for the local 
> add before sending to replicas.
> Cloning with the current SolrInputDocument, SolrInputField apis is a little 
> scary - there is an Object to contend with - but it seems we can pretty much 
> count on that being a primitive that we don't have to clone?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to