The api shouldn't be the goal. Those initial fst changes were driven by real needs an optimizations and are still great. The api will eventually take better shape and form based on those use cases i'm sure.
That patch that I had tried to extract a common notion of output and its grammar. It was half baked anyway so no big loss. On Jul 12, 2012 6:20 PM, "Michael McCandless" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The development was too fast for me to keep up. And by the time i had > some > > concept of the api mike wrote about million lines of code that would > have to > > be rewritten ;) > > Mike is very happy to help rewrite that code for a better FST API :) > > We can and should also make incremental improvements. > > I do agree it's horrible to have code that only a small set of people > understand: such code is effectively dead. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
