[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13412920#comment-13412920
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3377:
------------------------------------
Thanks Bernd, this looks like an improvement.
After some ad-hoc testing, it seems we still have problems with q=(+id:42)
Another minor concern: the change to clause.field to exclude things like '('
also means that when it's not a valid lucene query, our reconstructed query
will currently drop the paren.
Example: A query of (a:b with a qf=id correctly produces id:"(a:b"
but a query of (id:b produces id:b
That type of thing should really only affect exact match type fields where
punctuation isn't dropped - not sure how much of an issue it really is.
> eDismax: A fielded query wrapped by parens is not recognized
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3377
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: query parsers
> Affects Versions: 3.6
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Assignee: Yonik Seeley
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-3377.patch, SOLR-3377.patch, SOLR-3377.patch,
> SOLR-3377.patch
>
>
> As reported by "bernd" on the user list, a query like this
> {{q=(name:test)}}
> will yield 0 hits in 3.6 while it worked in 3.5. It works without the parens.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
