[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13415226#comment-13415226
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3892:
--------------------------------------------

I think a good thing to explore next is to stop using our own packed ints impl 
and instead cutover to oal.util.packed?  (Since so much effort has gone into 
making those impls fast).

LUCENE-4161 has already taken a big step towards making them usable ... we 
should prototype an initial cutover and then iterate?
                
> Add a useful intblock postings format (eg, FOR, PFOR, PFORDelta, 
> Simple9/16/64, etc.)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3892
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3892
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>              Labels: gsoc2012, lucene-gsoc-12
>             Fix For: 4.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3892-BlockTermScorer.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892-direct-IntBuffer.patch, LUCENE-3892-for&pfor-with-javadoc.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892-for&pfor-with-javadoc.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892-for&pfor-with-javadoc.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892-for&pfor-with-javadoc.patch, LUCENE-3892-for&pfor.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892-handle_open_files.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892-pfor-compress-iterate-numbits.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892-pfor-compress-slow-estimate.patch, LUCENE-3892_for.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892_for_byte[].patch, LUCENE-3892_for_int[].patch, 
> LUCENE-3892_for_unfold_method.patch, LUCENE-3892_pfor.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892_pfor.patch, LUCENE-3892_pfor.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892_pfor_unfold_method.patch, LUCENE-3892_pulsing_support.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892_settings.patch, LUCENE-3892_settings.patch
>
>
> On the flex branch we explored a number of possible intblock
> encodings, but for whatever reason never brought them to completion.
> There are still a number of issues opened with patches in different
> states.
> Initial results (based on prototype) were excellent (see
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2010/08/lucene-performance-with-pfordelta-codec.html
> ).
> I think this would make a good GSoC project.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to