Grant Ingersoll created LUCENE-4240:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Analyzer.getOffsetGap Improvements
Key: LUCENE-4240
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4240
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>From LUCENE-3151 (Robert Muir's comments): there is no need for the Analyzer
>to take in an IndexableField object. We can simplify this API:
{quote}
Hey Grant: I know it sounds silly but can we split out the getOffsetGap API
change into a separate issue?
This would be nice to fix ASAP.
I dont understand why it takes IndexableField or took Fieldable. All the other
methods here like
getPositionIncrementGap take "String fieldName". I think this one should too.
I dont think it needs a boolean for tokenized either: returning a 0 for
NOT_ANALYZED fields.
If you choose NOT_ANALYZED, that should mean the Analyzer is not invoked!
If you want to do expert stuff control the offset gaps between values for
NOT_ANALYZED fields,
then just analyze it instead, with keyword tokenizer!
{quote}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
