[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13425729#comment-13425729
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4276:
------------------------------------
Robert, why if someone disagrees with you, you react like that? Either VETO'ing
the disagreement, or looking for a way to force your opinion, like marking this
issue a Blocker?
I don't think this is a blocker issue, as there's no bug in Lucene -- if there
is, let's fix it (and preventing to run on a JVM is not a bug !). I won't
remove the blocker myself, out of respect to you (and I also don't think that's
how we should handle things in the community), but I ask that you remove it.
It's a community, not always people will agree with you. I think several times
before I pull out my PMC hat and VETO/force my opinion. In fact, I don't think
I ever VETO'ed an issue, but recently I came very close to doing that (glad
that so far I didn't need to).
Getting to a consensus / majority is better IMO. Let's not make this community
a "one man show".
> refuse to execute on broken corrupting jvms
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4276
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4276
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> There are some jvms where we know lucene does not work at all and will just
> produce things like corrupt indexes.
> We should detect this in a static block of Constants.java and refuse to run
> at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
