[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4282:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-4282.patch

here's a patch, with Uwe's test.

The float comparison is wasted cpu for FuzzyQuery, as you already know its 
accepted by the automaton.

But the deprecated SlowFuzzyQuery in sandbox needs this, because it has crazier 
logic. So it overrides the logic and does the float comparison. We should 
really remove that one from trunk since its deprecated since 4.x, it will make 
it easier to clean this up to be much simpler.

                
> Automaton Fuzzy Query doesn't deliver all results
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4282
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4282
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core/search
>    Affects Versions: 4.0-ALPHA
>            Reporter: Johannes Christen
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>              Labels: newbie
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4282-tests.patch, LUCENE-4282.patch, 
> ModifiedFuzzyTermsEnum.java, ModifiedFuzzyTermsEnum.java
>
>
> Having a small index with n documents where each document has one of the 
> following terms:
> WEBER, WEBE, WEB, WBR, WE, (and some more)
> The new FuzzyQuery (Automaton) with maxEdits=2 only delivers the expected 
> terms WEBER and WEBE in the rewritten query. The expected terms WEB and WBR 
> which have an edit distance of 2 as well are missing.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to