[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13432716#comment-13432716
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-3892:
--------------------------------------
I ran the comparison between acceptableOverheadRatio=PackedInts.COMPACT (0%)
and PackedInts.DEFAULT (20%) and it seems to be much faster with
PackedInts.COMPACT:
{noformat}
base=COMPACT, challenger=DEFAULT
Task QPS base StdDev base QPS def StdDev def Pct
diff
IntNRQ 81.83 5.43 74.14 2.94 -18% -
0%
HighTerm 146.55 10.34 133.57 9.02 -20% -
4%
LowPhrase 93.91 1.63 86.90 1.67 -10% -
-4%
MedTerm 824.58 43.48 766.35 38.78 -16% -
3%
LowSloppyPhrase 83.29 1.99 77.65 1.18 -10% -
-3%
OrHighMed 94.15 5.28 88.34 4.54 -15% -
4%
OrHighHigh 100.63 5.42 94.57 4.20 -14% -
3%
OrHighLow 128.62 7.21 120.92 6.07 -15% -
4%
HighPhrase 13.05 0.45 12.29 0.39 -11% -
0%
Prefix3 217.06 6.82 205.05 4.62 -10% -
0%
MedPhrase 27.50 0.97 26.33 0.79 -10% -
2%
Wildcard 183.20 4.87 175.58 3.89 -8% -
0%
LowTerm 1763.31 43.24 1693.31 39.29 -8% -
0%
HighSloppyPhrase 10.05 0.48 9.67 0.40 -11% -
5%
AndHighHigh 111.59 1.15 107.45 1.66 -6% -
-1%
LowSpanNear 56.16 1.32 54.25 1.01 -7% -
0%
AndHighMed 423.44 7.40 409.32 5.10 -6% -
0%
MedSpanNear 33.14 0.91 32.32 0.74 -7% -
2%
AndHighLow 2177.50 30.79 2134.05 28.64 -4% -
0%
Fuzzy1 95.34 2.41 93.66 2.32 -6% -
3%
HighSpanNear 5.28 0.17 5.21 0.11 -6% -
3%
MedSloppyPhrase 18.41 0.72 18.19 0.70 -8% -
6%
Fuzzy2 37.73 1.31 37.31 1.14 -7% -
5%
Respell 109.71 3.09 108.64 2.76 -6% -
4%
PKLookup 257.32 6.64 260.00 7.15 -4% -
6%
{noformat}
> Add a useful intblock postings format (eg, FOR, PFOR, PFORDelta,
> Simple9/16/64, etc.)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3892
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Labels: gsoc2012, lucene-gsoc-12
> Fix For: 4.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-3892-BlockTermScorer.patch,
> LUCENE-3892-blockFor&hardcode(base).patch,
> LUCENE-3892-blockFor&packedecoder(comp).patch,
> LUCENE-3892-blockFor-with-packedints-decoder.patch,
> LUCENE-3892-blockFor-with-packedints-decoder.patch,
> LUCENE-3892-blockFor-with-packedints.patch, LUCENE-3892-blockpfor.patch,
> LUCENE-3892-bulkVInt.patch, LUCENE-3892-direct-IntBuffer.patch,
> LUCENE-3892-for&pfor-with-javadoc.patch, LUCENE-3892-handle_open_files.patch,
> LUCENE-3892-non-specialized.patch,
> LUCENE-3892-pfor-compress-iterate-numbits.patch,
> LUCENE-3892-pfor-compress-slow-estimate.patch, LUCENE-3892_for_byte[].patch,
> LUCENE-3892_for_int[].patch, LUCENE-3892_for_unfold_method.patch,
> LUCENE-3892_pfor_unfold_method.patch, LUCENE-3892_pulsing_support.patch,
> LUCENE-3892_settings.patch, LUCENE-3892_settings.patch
>
>
> On the flex branch we explored a number of possible intblock
> encodings, but for whatever reason never brought them to completion.
> There are still a number of issues opened with patches in different
> states.
> Initial results (based on prototype) were excellent (see
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2010/08/lucene-performance-with-pfordelta-codec.html
> ).
> I think this would make a good GSoC project.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
