Replying to dev@ because Jira keeps being unavailable:

Seems like we should default BlockPostingsFormat to COMPACT.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Adrien Grand (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13432716#comment-13432716
>  ]
>
> Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-3892:
> --------------------------------------
>
> I ran the comparison between acceptableOverheadRatio=PackedInts.COMPACT (0%) 
> and PackedInts.DEFAULT (20%) and it seems to be much faster with 
> PackedInts.COMPACT:
>
> {noformat}
> base=COMPACT, challenger=DEFAULT
>                 Task    QPS base StdDev base     QPS def  StdDev def      Pct 
> diff
>               IntNRQ       81.83        5.43       74.14        2.94  -18% -  
>   0%
>             HighTerm      146.55       10.34      133.57        9.02  -20% -  
>   4%
>            LowPhrase       93.91        1.63       86.90        1.67  -10% -  
>  -4%
>              MedTerm      824.58       43.48      766.35       38.78  -16% -  
>   3%
>      LowSloppyPhrase       83.29        1.99       77.65        1.18  -10% -  
>  -3%
>            OrHighMed       94.15        5.28       88.34        4.54  -15% -  
>   4%
>           OrHighHigh      100.63        5.42       94.57        4.20  -14% -  
>   3%
>            OrHighLow      128.62        7.21      120.92        6.07  -15% -  
>   4%
>           HighPhrase       13.05        0.45       12.29        0.39  -11% -  
>   0%
>              Prefix3      217.06        6.82      205.05        4.62  -10% -  
>   0%
>            MedPhrase       27.50        0.97       26.33        0.79  -10% -  
>   2%
>             Wildcard      183.20        4.87      175.58        3.89   -8% -  
>   0%
>              LowTerm     1763.31       43.24     1693.31       39.29   -8% -  
>   0%
>     HighSloppyPhrase       10.05        0.48        9.67        0.40  -11% -  
>   5%
>          AndHighHigh      111.59        1.15      107.45        1.66   -6% -  
>  -1%
>          LowSpanNear       56.16        1.32       54.25        1.01   -7% -  
>   0%
>           AndHighMed      423.44        7.40      409.32        5.10   -6% -  
>   0%
>          MedSpanNear       33.14        0.91       32.32        0.74   -7% -  
>   2%
>           AndHighLow     2177.50       30.79     2134.05       28.64   -4% -  
>   0%
>               Fuzzy1       95.34        2.41       93.66        2.32   -6% -  
>   3%
>         HighSpanNear        5.28        0.17        5.21        0.11   -6% -  
>   3%
>      MedSloppyPhrase       18.41        0.72       18.19        0.70   -8% -  
>   6%
>               Fuzzy2       37.73        1.31       37.31        1.14   -7% -  
>   5%
>              Respell      109.71        3.09      108.64        2.76   -6% -  
>   4%
>             PKLookup      257.32        6.64      260.00        7.15   -4% -  
>   6%
> {noformat}
>
>> Add a useful intblock postings format (eg, FOR, PFOR, PFORDelta, 
>> Simple9/16/64, etc.)
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>                 Key: LUCENE-3892
>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3892
>>             Project: Lucene - Core
>>          Issue Type: Improvement
>>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>>              Labels: gsoc2012, lucene-gsoc-12
>>             Fix For: 4.1
>>
>>         Attachments: LUCENE-3892-BlockTermScorer.patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892-blockFor&hardcode(base).patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892-blockFor&packedecoder(comp).patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892-blockFor-with-packedints-decoder.patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892-blockFor-with-packedints-decoder.patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892-blockFor-with-packedints.patch, LUCENE-3892-blockpfor.patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892-bulkVInt.patch, LUCENE-3892-direct-IntBuffer.patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892-for&pfor-with-javadoc.patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892-handle_open_files.patch, LUCENE-3892-non-specialized.patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892-pfor-compress-iterate-numbits.patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892-pfor-compress-slow-estimate.patch, LUCENE-3892_for_byte[].patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892_for_int[].patch, LUCENE-3892_for_unfold_method.patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892_pfor_unfold_method.patch, LUCENE-3892_pulsing_support.patch, 
>> LUCENE-3892_settings.patch, LUCENE-3892_settings.patch
>>
>>
>> On the flex branch we explored a number of possible intblock
>> encodings, but for whatever reason never brought them to completion.
>> There are still a number of issues opened with patches in different
>> states.
>> Initial results (based on prototype) were excellent (see
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2010/08/lucene-performance-with-pfordelta-codec.html
>> ).
>> I think this would make a good GSoC project.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA 
> administrators: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to