[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13438232#comment-13438232
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3849:
-------------------------------------
What about the "off-by-one" though? Because the problem is a full
clearAttributes (which seems correct), sets the posIncAtt to a default of 1.
This makes consuming the tokenstream awkward because you have to subtract 1 in
this case. should we do something like clearAttributes() +
posIncAtt.setPositionIncrement(0) ?
> position increments should be implemented by TokenStream.end()
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3849
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3849
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.6, 4.0-ALPHA
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-3849.patch
>
>
> if you have pages of a book as multivalued fields, with the default position
> increment gap
> of analyzer.java (0), phrase queries won't work across pages if one ends with
> stopword(s).
> This is because the 'trailing holes' are not taken into account in end(). So
> I think in
> TokenStream.end(), subclasses of FilteringTokenFilter (e.g. stopfilter)
> should do:
> {code}
> super.end();
> posIncAtt += skippedPositions;
> {code}
> One problem is that these filters need to 'add' to the posinc, but currently
> nothing clears
> the attributes for end() [they are dirty, except offset which is set by the
> tokenizer].
> Also the indexer should be changed to pull posIncAtt from end().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
