Robert Muir created LUCENE-4355:
-----------------------------------
Summary: improve AtomicReader sugar apis
Key: LUCENE-4355
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4355
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Robert Muir
I thought about this after looking @ LUCENE-4353:
AtomicReader has some sugar APIs that are over top of the flex apis (Fields,
Terms, ...). But these might be a little trappy/confusing compared to 3.x.
# I dont think we need AtomicReader.termDocsEnum(Bits, ...) and
.termPositionsEnum(Bits, ...). I also don't think we need variants that take
flags here. We should simplify these to be less trappy. I think we only need
(String, BytesRef) here.
# This means you need to use the flex apis for more expert usage: but we make
this a bit too hard since we only let you get a Terms (which you must null
check, then call .iterator() on, then seekExact, ...). I think it could help if
we balanced this out by adding some sugar like AtomicReader.termsEnum? 3.x had
a method that let you get a 'positioned termsenum'.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
