[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13449163#comment-13449163
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on SOLR-3793:
--------------------------------

The problem seems to be specific to using UnInvertedField via facet.method=fc 
for faceting, but only if you have not already used facet.method=enum (no idea 
how using UnInvertedField during the faceting could affect the total result 
set)...

{noformat}
hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/solr/example/exampledocs$ java 
-Ddata=args -jar post.jar '<commit/>'
SimplePostTool version 1.5
POSTing args to http://localhost:8983/solr/update..
COMMITting Solr index changes to http://localhost:8983/solr/update..
hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/solr/example/exampledocs$ curl 
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?echoParams=none&q=ipod&rows=5&fl=id&facet=true&facet.field=cat&facet.mincount=1&facet.method=enum&wt=json&indent=true'
{
  "responseHeader":{
    "status":0,
    "QTime":4},
  "response":{"numFound":3,"start":0,"docs":[
      {
        "id":"IW-02"},
      {
        "id":"F8V7067-APL-KIT"},
      {
        "id":"MA147LL/A"}]
  },
  "facet_counts":{
    "facet_queries":{},
    "facet_fields":{
      "cat":[
        "electronics",3,
        "connector",2,
        "music",1]},
    "facet_dates":{},
    "facet_ranges":{}}}
hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/solr/example/exampledocs$ curl 
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?echoParams=none&q=ipod&rows=5&fl=id&facet=true&facet.field=cat&facet.mincount=1&facet.method=enum&wt=json&indent=true&fq=cat:electronics'
{
  "responseHeader":{
    "status":0,
    "QTime":3},
  "response":{"numFound":3,"start":0,"docs":[
      {
        "id":"IW-02"},
      {
        "id":"F8V7067-APL-KIT"},
      {
        "id":"MA147LL/A"}]
  },
  "facet_counts":{
    "facet_queries":{},
    "facet_fields":{
      "cat":[
        "electronics",3,
        "connector",2,
        "music",1]},
    "facet_dates":{},
    "facet_ranges":{}}}
hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/solr/example/exampledocs$ curl 
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?echoParams=none&q=ipod&rows=5&fl=id&facet=true&facet.field=cat&facet.mincount=1&facet.method=fc&wt=json&indent=true'
{
  "responseHeader":{
    "status":0,
    "QTime":3},
  "response":{"numFound":3,"start":0,"docs":[
      {
        "id":"IW-02"},
      {
        "id":"F8V7067-APL-KIT"},
      {
        "id":"MA147LL/A"}]
  },
  "facet_counts":{
    "facet_queries":{},
    "facet_fields":{
      "cat":[
        "electronics",3,
        "connector",2,
        "music",1]},
    "facet_dates":{},
    "facet_ranges":{}}}
hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/solr/example/exampledocs$ curl 
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?echoParams=none&q=ipod&rows=5&fl=id&facet=true&facet.field=cat&facet.mincount=1&facet.method=fc&wt=json&indent=true&fq=cat:electronics'
{
  "responseHeader":{
    "status":0,
    "QTime":1},
  "response":{"numFound":3,"start":0,"docs":[
      {
        "id":"IW-02"},
      {
        "id":"F8V7067-APL-KIT"},
      {
        "id":"MA147LL/A"}]
  },
  "facet_counts":{
    "facet_queries":{},
    "facet_fields":{
      "cat":[
        "electronics",3,
        "connector",2,
        "music",1]},
    "facet_dates":{},
    "facet_ranges":{}}}
hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/solr/example/exampledocs$ java 
-Ddata=args -jar post.jar '<commit/>'SimplePostTool version 1.5
POSTing args to http://localhost:8983/solr/update..
COMMITting Solr index changes to http://localhost:8983/solr/update..
hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/solr/example/exampledocs$ curl 
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?echoParams=none&q=ipod&rows=5&fl=id&facet=true&facet.field=cat&facet.mincount=1&facet.method=fc&wt=json&indent=true'
{
  "responseHeader":{
    "status":0,
    "QTime":5},
  "response":{"numFound":3,"start":0,"docs":[
      {
        "id":"IW-02"},
      {
        "id":"F8V7067-APL-KIT"},
      {
        "id":"MA147LL/A"}]
  },
  "facet_counts":{
    "facet_queries":{},
    "facet_fields":{
      "cat":[
        "electronics",3,
        "connector",2,
        "music",1]},
    "facet_dates":{},
    "facet_ranges":{}}}
hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/solr/example/exampledocs$ curl 
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?echoParams=none&q=ipod&rows=5&fl=id&facet=true&facet.field=cat&facet.mincount=1&facet.method=fc&wt=json&indent=true&fq=cat:electronics'
{
  "responseHeader":{
    "status":0,
    "QTime":2},
  "response":{"numFound":6,"start":0,"docs":[
      {
        "id":"IW-02"},
      {
        "id":"IW-02"},
      {
        "id":"F8V7067-APL-KIT"},
      {
        "id":"F8V7067-APL-KIT"},
      {
        "id":"MA147LL/A"}]
  },
  "facet_counts":{
    "facet_queries":{},
    "facet_fields":{
      "cat":[
        "electronics",6,
        "connector",4,
        "music",1]},
    "facet_dates":{},
    "facet_ranges":{}}}
{noformat}
                
> duplicate (deleted) documents included in result set when using field 
> faceting with fq
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3793
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3793
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.0-BETA
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Günter Hipler reported on the solr-user mailing list that he was seeing 
> inconsistencies in facet counts compared to the numFound when drilling down 
> onto those facets (using "fq") - in particular: when adding an "fq" such as 
> `fq={!term+f%3DnavNetwork}nebis`, the resulting numFound was higher then the 
> number of docs reported by the facet constraint for nebis in the base request.
> I've been able to trivially reproduce this using the example data from Solr 
> 4.0-BETA (details in comment to follow)
> Important things to note from Günter's email thread with his assessment of 
> the problem...
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201208.mbox/%3ccam_u7jfdpnrgfmwmntnachcdcjw4yb-rlbbvrw_wp_jdob_...@mail.gmail.com%3E
> bq. The behaviour is not consistent. Some of the facets provide the correct 
> result, some not.  What I can't say for sure: The behaviour was correct (if 
> I'm not wrong) once the whole index was newly created. After running some 
> updates I got these results.
> bq. I'm going to setup a new index with the Lucene 4.0 version from March (to 
> be more exactly: it's version 4.0-2012-03-09_11-29-20) to see what are the 
> results even in case of frequent updates ... the version deployed in march 
> doesn't contain the error I now come across in Beta4.0 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to