[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13471081#comment-13471081
 ] 

David Smiley commented on LUCENE-4285:
--------------------------------------

I admit checked exceptions would have alerted me to my bug, but that doesn't 
make the API any nicer -- I still need null checks littered through my FST user 
code now.  I don't know the FST internals but I'd be surprised to hear that 
adding support for an empty FST adds appreciable overhead.  If this "overhead" 
we're discussing is a simple conditional check, then this is net-zero since as 
it is I need these null checks on my end of the API due to my FST being 
potentially null.
                
> Improve FST API usability for mere mortals
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4285
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4285
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core/FSTs
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>
> FST technology is something that has brought amazing advances to Lucene, yet 
> the API is hard to use for the vast majority of users like me.  I know that 
> performance of FSTs is really important, but surely a lot can be done without 
> sacrificing that.
> (comments will hold specific ideas and problems)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to