On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl> wrote: >> repros if I use randomized runner but not if I use JUnit's runner. > > Maybe it's close enough to the memory limit to be a non-significant > difference? You could try decreasing memory to see when JUnit's runner > starts failing for the same seed. > > There's some overhead of using randomized runner but I don't think > it's going to be significant.
OK indeed looks like it was just "wicked close": with JUnit's runner it passes with 499 MB heap but fails with 498 MB heap. Good :) Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
