[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13487663#comment-13487663 ]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3855: ----------------------------------- {quote} Additionally I currently force doc values to be non-direct (ie. in-memory). Do you think it is fine or should we give people the choice? {quote} I think we should provide direct: maybe even by default? I guess the exception would be things like sorted bytes (I think you cannot sort direct?). But besides that, this is why I raised questions about "acts like stored fields". {quote} I was thinking of non-direct doc values for ID fields. {quote} I was describing direct :) > DocValues support > ----------------- > > Key: SOLR-3855 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3855 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Assignee: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.1, 5.0 > > Attachments: SOLR-3855.patch > > > It would be nice if Solr supported DocValues: > - for ID fields (fewer disk seeks when running distributed search), > - for sorting/faceting/function queries (faster warmup time than fieldcache), > - better on-disk and in-memory efficiency (you can use packed impls). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org