[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13487663#comment-13487663
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3855:
-----------------------------------
{quote}
Additionally I currently force doc values to be non-direct (ie. in-memory). Do
you think it is fine or should we give people the choice?
{quote}
I think we should provide direct: maybe even by default? I guess the exception
would be things like sorted bytes (I think you cannot sort direct?). But
besides that, this is why I raised questions about "acts like stored fields".
{quote}
I was thinking of non-direct doc values for ID fields.
{quote}
I was describing direct :)
> DocValues support
> -----------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3855
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3855
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.1, 5.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-3855.patch
>
>
> It would be nice if Solr supported DocValues:
> - for ID fields (fewer disk seeks when running distributed search),
> - for sorting/faceting/function queries (faster warmup time than fieldcache),
> - better on-disk and in-memory efficiency (you can use packed impls).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
