[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13504599#comment-13504599 ]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4576: --------------------------------------- +1. While working on random access filters, I removed the cache options completely, but Mike readded them later (I have to lookup the issue number). In my opinion, Robert is right: If you don't have a static index, the chahing of deletes is horrible, as it invalidates the cache on every delete. If you have a static index, you should expungedeletes it, so all acceptDocs will be null and BitsFilteredDocIdSet (used by the Cache to apply deletes) with be a no-op. > Remove CachingWrapperFilter recacheDeletes boolean > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-4576 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4576 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Robert Muir > > I think this option is bad news, its just a trap that causes caches to be > uselessly invalidated. > If you really have a totally static index then just expunge your deletes. > Let's remove the option and complexity. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org