[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13505496#comment-13505496
 ] 

Per Steffensen commented on SOLR-4114:
--------------------------------------

bq. Per: this is unrelated to your patch of course - it just happened to come 
up here.

No problem. I could make it as part of this patch if you want, but Im not sure 
I agree with your way of interpreting the term "replication-factor". I would 
expect "replication-factor" to say something about how many times the data is 
REPLICATED. If I run with only one copy of the data for each slice, I would 
logically say that my data is not replicated, and that matches the 
replication-factor of 0.

I have used HDFS and HBase a little a year or so ago, but Im not sure what 
meaning they put into the term "replica". I've also worked a lot with 
ElasticSearch (which I believe is more of a pendant to Solr) and in 
ElasticSearch I believe they use the term "replica" as the number of ADDITIONAL 
copies of the data - equal to your/our current implementation in Solr.
                
> Collection API: Allow multiple shards from one collection on the same Solr 
> server
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4114
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4114
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: multicore, SolrCloud
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>         Environment: Solr 4.0.0 release
>            Reporter: Per Steffensen
>            Assignee: Per Steffensen
>              Labels: collection-api, multicore, shard, shard-allocation
>         Attachments: SOLR-4114.patch
>
>
> We should support running multiple shards from one collection on the same 
> Solr server - the run a collection with 8 shards on a 4 Solr server cluster 
> (each Solr server running 2 shards).
> Performance tests at our side has shown that this is a good idea, and it is 
> also a good idea for easy elasticity later on - it is much easier to move an 
> entire existing shards from one Solr server to another one that just joined 
> the cluter than it is to split an exsiting shard among the Solr that used to 
> run it and the new Solr.
> See dev mailing list discussion "Multiple shards for one collection on the 
> same Solr server"

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to