[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-4592:
----------------------------------
Description:
The formula in the JavaDocs of NumericRangeQuery that returns the maximum
number of terms in the NRQ's TermsEnum is confusing tthe user.
I will fix the documentation and also add some more numbers to the of
NumericField (e.g. the average number of term in index).
was:
The formula in the JavaDocs of NumericRangeQuery that returns the maximum
number of terms in the NRQ's TermsEnum is incorrect. The original one from the
paper did not use precisionStep but used the number of terms per value from the
tokenizer.
I will fix the documentation and also add some more numbers to the Docs of
NumericField
> Fix Formula in Javadocs of NumericRangeQuery
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4592
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4592
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: general/javadocs
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Uwe Schindler
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Fix For: 4.1, 5.0
>
>
> The formula in the JavaDocs of NumericRangeQuery that returns the maximum
> number of terms in the NRQ's TermsEnum is confusing tthe user.
> I will fix the documentation and also add some more numbers to the of
> NumericField (e.g. the average number of term in index).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
