I agree with the SolrCloud page specifically. SolrCloud has so many changes between 4.0 and 4.1. I am guessing that by the time we get to 4.2 or 4.3 that it will all be much more stable and then going back to marking it with a revision will work like the other wiki pages have.
On Dec 17, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Apache Wiki <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Should I say this is a Solr 4.1 change? > > I really think we need to version the SolrCloud page. > > I think we need to version our docs in general, but the SolrCloud page > already needs to be broken up I think. I'm just waiting until we start on a > better docs route. But until then, it seems to crazy to litter it with > if(thisversion) then. > > I think we should make a 4.0 version and then copy it and tweak to a 4.1 > version. > > There are tradeoffs to this, but in my opinion its the only way to keep > things sane. > > - Mark > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > ----------------------------------------------------- Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com Co-Author: Apache Solr 3 Enterprise Search Server available from http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
