[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13558287#comment-13558287
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4600:
--------------------------------------------
bq. Can you compare it to Counting directly?
Ugh, sorry, that is in fact what I ran but I put the wrong base/comp above it.
The test was actually base = PostCollectionCountingFacetsCollector, comp =
CountingFacetsCollector.
> Explore facets aggregation during documents collection
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4600
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4600
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/facet
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Attachments: LUCENE-4600-cli.patch, LUCENE-4600.patch,
> LUCENE-4600.patch, LUCENE-4600.patch, LUCENE-4600.patch, LUCENE-4600.patch,
> LUCENE-4600.patch
>
>
> Today the facet module simply gathers all hits (as a bitset, optionally with
> a float[] to hold scores as well, if you will aggregate them) during
> collection, and then at the end when you call getFacetsResults(), it makes a
> 2nd pass over all those hits doing the actual aggregation.
> We should investigate just aggregating as we collect instead, so we don't
> have to tie up transient RAM (fairly small for the bit set but possibly big
> for the float[]).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
