On Jan 29, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure what it would show though, since you don't get > into this situation without loading and unloading cores at the same > time, the stuff from SOLR-1028 and SOLR-4300. Which you couldn't do > before this rapidly. I don't follow this at all - of course you could rapidly load and unload cores at the same time before this patch? If you cannot easily produce a test that causes deadlock without your patch, I'm less inclined to believe it's an existing issue. Like I said, that synchronization is complicated - it's easy to mess it up if you don't follow how it all works. - Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
