Nope, as far as I know. Even that field type work itself, I suppose it's not a piece of cake to marry it with SolrCloud. How much an additional software complexity and development efforts you'd spend for that CPU gain? Is it really sensible for you? How big your replication factor (or quantor) ?
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, something like that :) > > Is that used in SolrCloud when sending docs to replicas to avoid all > replicas having to do the exact same analysis? > > Otis > -- > http://sematext.com/ > On Feb 11, 2013 1:51 AM, "Mikhail Khludnev" <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> > wrote: > >> Otis, >> >> It reminds me https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1535 How do >> they match? >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Otis Gospodnetic < >> otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> When a doc is pushed into SolrCloud it is sent to all shard's replicas >>> for analysis and indexing, right? >>> >>> Wouldn't it make sense to do the analysis just once and send the already >>> analyzed doc over the wire and have the receiving servers for just indexing >>> (no analysis)? For index-heavy apps this could be a big CPU saver. Or is >>> this already being done? >>> >>> Otis >>> -- >>> http://sematext.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely yours >> Mikhail Khludnev >> Principal Engineer, >> Grid Dynamics >> >> <http://www.griddynamics.com> >> <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> >> > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Principal Engineer, Grid Dynamics <http://www.griddynamics.com> <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
