[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13576681#comment-13576681
 ] 

Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4769:
------------------------------------

I wonder, since CachedInts for a segment is created only once, if we should 
make it more generic, and work w/ IntDecoder instead of hard-coding to 
dgap+vint? Then, we can make this class top-level, e.g. as OrdinalsCache with a 
static getCachedInts/Ords for a segment? Otherwise, I'll add an assert to 
CachedIntsCountingFacetsAggregator to ensure the decoder used is DGapVInt.
                
> Add a CountingFacetsAggregator which reads ordinals from a cache
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4769
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4769
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: modules/facet
>            Reporter: Shai Erera
>            Assignee: Shai Erera
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4769.patch, LUCENE-4769.patch
>
>
> Mike wrote a prototype of a FacetsCollector which reads ordinals from a 
> CachedInts structure on LUCENE-4609. I ported it to the new facets API, as a 
> FacetsAggregator. I think we should offer users the means to use such a 
> cache, even if it consumes more RAM. Mike tests show that this cache consumed 
> x2 more RAM than if the DocValues were loaded into memory in their raw form. 
> Also, a PackedInts version of such cache took almost the same amount of RAM 
> as straight int[], but the gains were minor.
> I will post the patch shortly.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to