[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13604213#comment-13604213
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4838:
-------------------------------------

I dont like the method name getOrd. these arent ordinals...
                
> Add getOrd to BytesRefHash
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4838
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4838
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core/other
>            Reporter: Shai Erera
>            Assignee: Shai Erera
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4838.patch
>
>
> There is no API today to query BytesRefHash for the existence of a certain 
> BytesRef. Rather, you should use .add(), which looks up the given bytes, and 
> hashes them if they are not found, or returns their ord if they are found.
> I would like to add a simple getOrd API which will return the ord of a given 
> BytesRef, or -1 if not found. I would like to use that API in the facet 
> module, and I need to be able to query the hash without necessarily adding 
> elements to it.
> I have a simple patch, will post shortly.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to