That would be nice! There is similar machinery in Solr's ExternalFileField. In the spatial module I'd like to cache data per-segment; it's current cache sucks to say the least. My current plans are to use BinaryDocValues so I might not use this proposed machinery after-all but nonetheless I think it's useful.
~ David Alan Woodward-2 wrote > I'm looking at exposing data held externally to an index via a > ValueSource, and it would be nice to reuse the machinery in FieldCacheImpl > to cache the data per-segment. However, it's package-private at the > moment, which means I can't extend it nicely. Is there a reason for this? > Or should I put up a JIRA to make it public? > > Alan Woodward > www.flax.co.uk ----- Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Opening-up-FieldCacheImpl-tp4050537p4050579.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
