[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Renaud Delbru updated LUCENE-4919:
----------------------------------
Description:
IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef implementation do not follow the java
Arrays.hashCode implementation, and return incorrect hashcode when filled with
0.
For example, an IntsRef with \{ 0 \} will return the same hashcode than an
IntsRef with \{ 0, 0 \}.
was:
IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef implementation does not follow the java
Arrays.hashCode implementation, and returns incorrect hashcode when filled with
0.
For example, an IntsRef with \{ 0 \} will return the same hashcode than an
IntsRef with \{ 0, 0 \}.
Summary: IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef return incorrect hashcode when
filled with 0 (was: IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef returns incorrect hashcode
when filled with 0)
> IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef return incorrect hashcode when filled with 0
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4919
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4919
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core/other
> Affects Versions: 4.2
> Reporter: Renaud Delbru
> Fix For: 4.3
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4919.patch
>
>
> IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef implementation do not follow the java
> Arrays.hashCode implementation, and return incorrect hashcode when filled
> with 0.
> For example, an IntsRef with \{ 0 \} will return the same hashcode than an
> IntsRef with \{ 0, 0 \}.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
