[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Renaud Delbru updated LUCENE-4919: ---------------------------------- Description: IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef implementation do not follow the java Arrays.hashCode implementation, and return incorrect hashcode when filled with 0. For example, an IntsRef with \{ 0 \} will return the same hashcode than an IntsRef with \{ 0, 0 \}. was: IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef implementation does not follow the java Arrays.hashCode implementation, and returns incorrect hashcode when filled with 0. For example, an IntsRef with \{ 0 \} will return the same hashcode than an IntsRef with \{ 0, 0 \}. Summary: IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef return incorrect hashcode when filled with 0 (was: IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef returns incorrect hashcode when filled with 0) > IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef return incorrect hashcode when filled with 0 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-4919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4919 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core/other > Affects Versions: 4.2 > Reporter: Renaud Delbru > Fix For: 4.3 > > Attachments: LUCENE-4919.patch > > > IntsRef, BytesRef and CharsRef implementation do not follow the java > Arrays.hashCode implementation, and return incorrect hashcode when filled > with 0. > For example, an IntsRef with \{ 0 \} will return the same hashcode than an > IntsRef with \{ 0, 0 \}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org