[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13633557#comment-13633557
 ] 

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-4718:
--------------------------------------

There is no problem I can't make unnecessarily complex...

Let me take a whack at it, as you say given the assumptions it's pretty 
straight-forward.
Here's the rules then:

  a> solr.xml is a local file. Apply local solr.properties only if new-style 
(changes when we stop supporting old-style solr.xml). Stop

  b> zkhost is specified as a sysprop. Read solr.xml from ZK. If found, apply 
local solr.properties (if any) and stop.

  c> zkhost is specified in local solr.properties. Use it to get solr.xml from 
ZK. If found, apply local solr.properties (if any) and stop

  d> Use the current hard-coded old-style solr.xml file. Do NOT apply any local 
solr.properties (this will change when we stop supporting old-style solr.xml).

                
> Allow solr.xml to be stored in zookeeper
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4718
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4718
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Schema and Analysis
>    Affects Versions: 4.3, 5.0
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>
> So the near-final piece of this puzzle is to make solr.xml be storable in 
> Zookeeper. Code-wise in terms of Solr, this doesn't look very difficult, I'm 
> working on it now.
> More interesting is how to get the configuration into ZK in the first place, 
> enhancements to ZkCli? Or boostrap-conf? Other? I'm punting on that for this 
> patch.
> Second level is how to tell Solr to get the file from ZK. Some possibilities:
> 1> A system prop, -DzkSolrXmlPath=blah where blah is the path _on zk_ where 
> the file is. Would require -DzkHost or -DzkRun as well.
>   > pros - simple, I can wrap my head around it.
>          - easy to script
>   > cons - can't run multiple JVMs pointing to different files. Is this 
> really a problem?
> 2> New solr.xml element. Something like:
> <solr>
>   <solrcloud>
>      <str name="zkHost">zkurl</str>
>      <str name="zkSolrXmlPath">whatever</str>
>   </solrcloud>
> <solr>
>    Really, this form would hinge on the presence or absence of zkSolrXmlPath. 
> If present, go up and look for the indicated solr.xml file on ZK. Any 
> properties in the ZK version would overwrite anything in the local copy.
> NOTE: I'm really not very interested in supporting this as an option for 
> old-style solr.xml unless it's _really_ easy. For instance, what if the local 
> solr.xml is new-style and the one in ZK is old-style? Or vice-versa? Since 
> old-style is going away, this doesn't seem like it's worth the effort.
> pros - No new mechanisms
> cons - once again requires that there be a solr.xml file on each client. 
> Admittedly for installations that didn't care much about multiple JVMs, it 
> could be a stock file that didn't change...
> For now, I'm going to just manually push solr.xml to ZK, then read it based 
> on a sysprop. That'll get the structure in place while we debate. Not going 
> to check this in until there's some consensus though.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to