I thought I had two weeks, so that's what I planned on. I figured that if someone else pick up the baton first, they would actually be decent and give a day or two notice.
I didn't go, oh, Rob said two weeks, but some dude might just say "I'm building an RC right now!" at any moment. It's not normally how we operate. Normally, there is a bit of warning before an RC is built. We normally release as a group, not as a lone ranger that doesn't care about the rest of the devs and is just going to make his RC at the drop of a hat with no warning or care what others think. - Mark On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Simon Willnauer <[email protected]> wrote: > dude you had 12 days since rob send the note to the list. what are you > talking about? > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Simon Willnauer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > honestly I don't think we should push in last minute changes by saying "oh > > I will wait 2 days" We should release early and often as we do and fixes > > will make it to the next release right next month. > > Review and bug fixes are not last minute changes. Pretending we should not > focus on a release is ridicules. I want to release quality software, not > hurried crap. > > > Robert say I will do one in the next 2 weeks unless somebody is quicker. As > > always folks say we release once somebody volunteers. I don't know how > > often I had something in the pipeline that I wanted in the release and I as > > often we had this discussion. The 4.2 release was not even announced before > > the RC was up and I think this is how it should be. You can do another > > release soon in about 3 week or whatever. > > Dude, asking for a small amount of planning on a release seems very > reasonable. Wake up today and surprise "release" is ridiculous. Not even a > day or two notice? > > If this is how it goes, I'm happy to just randomly start tossing up RC all > the time with no discussion or notice to the list. > > I'll probably toss one up a few days after you do after I do my review. > > - Mark > > > > > simon > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > How about a short heads up so that people working on 4.3 issues can > > actually wrap up? I know I have review I want to finish before 4.3 at > > least. > > > > Robert gave a warning of 2 weeks, then less than a week later you say, I'm > > rolling now? Can't we at least have a day or two notice to wrap? > > > > - Mark > > > > On Apr 17, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Simon Willnauer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > I started a release branch for Lucene / Solr 4.3 > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_3/ > > > I will update the 4.x branch now and build the first RC > > > > > > simon > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 4.3 is looking good already. If nobody has spun a release candidate in > > > two weeks, I will. > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
