Steven, I think we don't really have a problem here. my intention here was to build a release. I wanted to branch to make sure we work towards the release soon since I think the features are awesome. I wanted to build a relaese candidate so folks that need to integrate into apps have an easier life like myself when I pull this in via maven on several projects I have to test here. The confusion started when make started saying "wait... can we have ...." etc. I didn't like to announce branching ahead of time like Robert said but I never intended to release instantaneously. I saw the release candidate rather like something we can start working on towards a release.
sorry about the confusion, I learned my lesson... simon On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > (I accidentally sent this only to Simon - resending now to the dev list) > > On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Simon Willnauer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Simon Willnauer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Simon Willnauer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> I didn't expect that this would go > >>>>> through without any respin. I'd just have appreciated to not get a > >>>>> "WTF are you doing why don't you tell us etc." if there was a warning > >>>>> like 6 days ahead. > >>>> > >>>> Again, it was not your warning, and the timeline differed. These > details matter, Simon! > >>> > >>> apparently they only matter because it's me I guess. but that's fine I > can take that. […] > >> > >> When you say "they only matter because it's me", I think you mean: I > work for LucidWorks, you work for ElasticSearch, our companies compete, and > I'm willing to use this opportunity to hassle you in order to further the > interests of my company. If that's what you mean, Simon, then I call > bullshit, and I'm further saddened that *you* are willing to use this as an > argument here. I truly believe that if another LucidWorks employee had > done the same as you, I would be just as critical. > > > > dude where are you coming from? No I am not saying that and I don't > think companies are related here. I actually was surprised that you are > working for lucid which wasn't aware of but now that you say it I recall > you having lucid slide at apache con. But even then, I don't care that is > not about companies. Lets stop this right here that is bogus. I said that > because it seemed like a witch hunt to me and I don't get all the pushback > and resistance here. Next time, if I volunteer for a release I will ask you > guys all with enough handholding etc. in advance to make sure that every > body is happen and I can't step on anybodies toes but running svn copy and > start a python script. > > I'm sorry I misinterpreted what you wrote, Simon. Here's where I'm coming > from: just before you wrote "they only matter because it's me I guess" on > this thread, you wrote on a private chat to me: "do you get paid for that > LOL :) […] this is a joke isn't it" and I put two and two together. I > didn't know how else to interpret what you wrote. I'm happy that I was > wrong. > > In that same private chat, Simon, you wrote (I'm paraphrasing here) that > once I used the word "fuck", I ended the possibility of having a civil > conversation. I admit that I used it for shock value, because I wanted to > convey how I thought you were being disrespectful of others' opinions. > I'll stop doing that. I apologize for offending you, Simon. > > But I won't stop speaking up when I see a problem with the way we conduct > our affairs on this project. > > Steve > >
