[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13644101#comment-13644101
 ] 

Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4965:
------------------------------------

Comments:

* Range is not really extendable (private ctor) -- is that intentional? I guess 
there's not much point extending it ...

* Any reason why not take primitive values and let the user define e.g 
Long.MAX_VALUE as an unlimited upper bound? I'm not a big fan of auto-boxing, 
and passing null is as good to me as passing MAX_VAL. User has to make a 
decision anyway, so might as well be explicit about it.

* Accumulate() iterates at the outer loop on matchingDocs, and inner loop on 
ranges. I remember while writing FacetsAccumulator that luceneutil was happier 
with the other way (matchingDocs inner). Maybe test?

* Shouldn't {{if (ranges.ranges.accept(v))}} break if there's a match?
** While at it, maybe RangeSet should sort the ranges by their minimum value? 
Not sure if asymptotically this will matter...

* I don't think it matters much, but maybe allocate {{new 
ArrayList<FacetResultNode>()}} with {{ranges.ranges.length}}?

I think this we're almost ready!
                
> Add dynamic numeric range faceting
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4965
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/facet
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 5.0, 4.4
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4965.patch, LUCENE-4965.patch, LUCENE-4965.patch, 
> LUCENE-4965.patch, LUCENE-4965.patch
>
>
> The facet module today requires the app to compute the hierarchy
> at index time, eg a timestamp field might use a year/month/day
> hierarchy.
> While this gives great performance, since it minimizes the search-time
> computation, sometimes it's unfortunately useful/necessary to do things 
> entirely at
> search time, like Solr does.
> E.g. I'm playing with a prototype Lucene search for Jira issues
> and I'd like to add a drill down+sideways for "Updated in past day,
> 2 days, week, month" etc.  But because time is constantly advancing,
> doing this at index time is a not easy ...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to